Note on review tool version
See the top of the page to confirm the review tool version used for this report:
- Our current review tools are version 2.0. Learn more >
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (version 1.0 or 1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align to current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools >
Report Overview
Summary of Alignment & Usability: Zearn | Math
Math K-2
The instructional materials for Zearn Grades 1-5 meet the expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1. All grades meet the expectations for focus as they assess grade-level topics and spend the majority of class time on major work of the grade. Grades 1-5 meet the expectations for coherence, In Gateway 2, all grades meet the expectations for rigor and balance, but all grades partially meet the expectations for practice-content connections as they do not always identify the Mathematical Practices or attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. In Gateway 3, all grades meet the expectations for instructional supports and usability. The instructional materials show strengths by being well designed and taking into account effective lesson structure and pacing, and they meet the expectations for offering teachers resources and tools to collect ongoing data about student progress on the Standards.
Materials for Kindergarten were not available at the time the review was initiated. EdReports will review the materials in the future.
Kindergarten
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
1st Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
2nd Grade
View Full ReportAlignment (Gateway 1 & 2)
Usability (Gateway 3)
Math 3-5
The instructional materials for Zearn Grades 1-5 meet the expectations for focus and coherence in Gateway 1. All grades meet the expectations for focus as they assess grade-level topics and spend the majority of class time on major work of the grade. Grades 1-5 meet the expectations for coherence, In Gateway 2, all grades meet the expectations for rigor and balance, but all grades partially meet the expectations for practice-content connections as they do not always identify the Mathematical Practices or attend to the full meaning of each practice standard. In Gateway 3, all grades meet the expectations for instructional supports and usability. The instructional materials show strengths by being well designed and taking into account effective lesson structure and pacing, and they meet the expectations for offering teachers resources and tools to collect ongoing data about student progress on the Standards.